scriptive: art by <user name="rboz" site="tumblr.com"> (WELL ๐ŸŒธ if you wanna know really)
levy mcgarden ([personal profile] scriptive) wrote2017-05-03 10:23 am
twelfthspark: ([:|] it's a chance gonna move)

[personal profile] twelfthspark 2017-05-04 03:21 am (UTC)(link)
[@Arlene Sinclair shared a link.] You're lucky I didn't close it yet
thesettingsun: smile (I won't ride along in your helicopter)

[personal profile] thesettingsun 2017-05-04 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Can newts be indicted by human laws? I don't think you'd arrest a dog for public indecency.
zerotohiro: (I think I get it)

[personal profile] zerotohiro 2017-05-04 07:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, then science field trip is a go! I don't have any classes on Friday so maybe then? We can go during lunch when people aren't going to come by anyway, it shouldn't take that long to get the data I want. And we can leave a sign on the door that's like "Hey sorry we're answering Really Important Questions, come back in an hour" or something. It's a pretty solid plan.

And I'll think about it. If we DON'T find answers I'll want something to distract me anyway. Do you know how many times I have to pretend I know what I'm talking about when you group comes into the store? It's almost embarrassing.
roseblooms: hold your head up though no one is near (FOND โ scary monsters and nice youkos)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-04 07:46 pm (UTC)(link)
It certainly does. Using a keyword makes a simple alphabet substitution comparatively much stronger in one easy step, but only if it's not something easily guessed.

And besides, any substitution cypher is still subject to a letter frequency analysis. Provided the message is long enough for average frequencies to apply, you can disguise the base message all you want, but in the end it'll still always be subject to the same letter frequencies in English.
roseblooms: she owes me at least three trips to space camp (PONDER โ so where is carmen sandiego)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-04 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)
All of which boils down to the same general principle, I think, which is: codes and ciphers function because of a combination of complexity and secrecy. The holder of the key has the ability to waive the secrecy — but there's really no getting around the complexity, no matter whether the message is intended for you or not.
roseblooms: hold your head up though no one is near (FOND โ scary monsters and nice youkos)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-04 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
You'd need rules for it, certainly. Like a fair mystery — something that ensures the codes and ciphers can be rendered difficult, but not impossible.
skald: (kolmetoista)

[personal profile] skald 2017-05-04 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Thaaaaaat's. Um.

Do you want a hand looking for cameras? Or company? Are you home alone?
thesettingsun: smile (I'm a good guy)

[personal profile] thesettingsun 2017-05-04 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Are we talking about dog-shaped dogs in people clothes, or like, dog furries?
roseblooms: i may be bad but i'm perfectly good at it (COAT โ time for some protag swag)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-04 09:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Exactly. Some form of regulation, at least — because there are, after all, such things as literally unbreakable codes.

(How much weirder are you thinking?)

Page 2 of 10