roseblooms: yes because that won't end badly at all (STUNNED ❁ are you watering the kudzu)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-06 04:33 am (UTC)(link)
(They GAINED BACK a LIMB??)
roseblooms: excuse you i am obviously erika, asshole (DAFUQ ❁ wait whoa why am i whitney)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-06 05:34 pm (UTC)(link)
(That's not just horrifying, that ought to be nigh-impossible. How could someone possibly...?)
roseblooms: she owes me at least three trips to space camp (PONDER ❁ so where is carmen sandiego)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-07 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)
(That seems as though that should be two different spheres of influence, though. Mass acceptance of the elimination of a CONCEPT versus...the physical replacement of a tangible...

Does the limb WORK, do we know? Is it functional?)
roseblooms: excuse you i am obviously erika, asshole (DAFUQ ❁ wait whoa why am i whitney)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-09 04:20 pm (UTC)(link)
(I see. That does make sense, yes — I can see how it would be terribly rude to simply...ask.)
roseblooms: gosh wouldn't it be bad if something ...happened to it (OUTSMART ❁ i'm sorry did you need this)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-09 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)
(To say the least.)

...

(Why are we still writing to each other in parentheses?)
roseblooms: and everybody here be thinkin' who's that boy (GLAM ❁ my kind of body needs a spotlight)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-09 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm sure part of it is graduate assistant pedantism, as well. Spelling, punctuation, grammar, being right always.
roseblooms: can you stand against my hierophant greenery (GLASSES ❁ this is my kakyoin impression)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-09 08:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Really strange things like what, for example?
roseblooms: yes because that won't end badly at all (STUNNED ❁ are you watering the kudzu)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-10 06:10 pm (UTC)(link)
A...frog-man. In human clothes.

And that makes you MORE convinced that these hallucinations are legitimate?
roseblooms: can you stand against my hierophant greenery (GLASSES ❁ this is my kakyoin impression)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-11 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
And you feel certain that there's a link between my presence on this app and the likelihood that I'll start having these...visions?
roseblooms: i mean yes heelies are great in concept but (DUBIOUS ❁ not sure if want)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-11 05:30 am (UTC)(link)
How utterly unsettling.

I suppose it doesn't help that I can't possibly imagine what sort of hallucinations I might have. I'm afraid I'm almost breathtakingly normal — honestly, to the point of being outright boring, perhaps.
roseblooms: but seriously does he know he's not wearing any pants (MENTION ❁ a shakespearean-grade aside)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-11 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
...As though one scenario jogs the memory of the other, you're saying? So — in your case, for example, seeing someone being arrested leading to the notion of your, ah, frog-man doing the same?
roseblooms: i'm pretty sure it'd involve tasing somebody at least (EXAMINE ❁ wwpd: what would parker do)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-11 05:41 am (UTC)(link)
Just now, you recalled something? That's...fascinating, to say the least.

For what it's worth, I didn't feel anything of the sort, so it's evidently not a shared experience — just a unilateral one.
roseblooms: no one stays dead in this show and i think that's beautiful (ASIDE ❁ that's bullshit but i believe it)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-11 03:17 pm (UTC)(link)
And particularly so when the administrator of the app both appears to be watching and is going out of his way to taunt any users who might attempt to offer up something of value.

The nail that sticks out gets hammered down, and so on.

(no subject)

[personal profile] roseblooms - 2017-05-13 00:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] roseblooms - 2017-05-15 02:19 (UTC) - Expand