roseblooms: no one stays dead in this show and i think that's beautiful (ASIDE ❁ that's bullshit but i believe it)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-05 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
A disposable shared key. Hence the "one-time" aspect — one sheet of the pad, one encryption, and then it's disposed of.

(I've heard mentions of traumatic physical injury.)
roseblooms: yes because that won't end badly at all (STUNNED ❁ are you watering the kudzu)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-06 04:33 am (UTC)(link)
(They GAINED BACK a LIMB??)
roseblooms: excuse you i am obviously erika, asshole (DAFUQ ❁ wait whoa why am i whitney)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-06 05:34 pm (UTC)(link)
(That's not just horrifying, that ought to be nigh-impossible. How could someone possibly...?)
roseblooms: she owes me at least three trips to space camp (PONDER ❁ so where is carmen sandiego)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-07 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)
(That seems as though that should be two different spheres of influence, though. Mass acceptance of the elimination of a CONCEPT versus...the physical replacement of a tangible...

Does the limb WORK, do we know? Is it functional?)
roseblooms: excuse you i am obviously erika, asshole (DAFUQ ❁ wait whoa why am i whitney)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-09 04:20 pm (UTC)(link)
(I see. That does make sense, yes — I can see how it would be terribly rude to simply...ask.)
roseblooms: gosh wouldn't it be bad if something ...happened to it (OUTSMART ❁ i'm sorry did you need this)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-09 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)
(To say the least.)

...

(Why are we still writing to each other in parentheses?)
roseblooms: and everybody here be thinkin' who's that boy (GLAM ❁ my kind of body needs a spotlight)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-09 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm sure part of it is graduate assistant pedantism, as well. Spelling, punctuation, grammar, being right always.
roseblooms: can you stand against my hierophant greenery (GLASSES ❁ this is my kakyoin impression)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-09 08:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Really strange things like what, for example?
roseblooms: yes because that won't end badly at all (STUNNED ❁ are you watering the kudzu)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-10 06:10 pm (UTC)(link)
A...frog-man. In human clothes.

And that makes you MORE convinced that these hallucinations are legitimate?
roseblooms: can you stand against my hierophant greenery (GLASSES ❁ this is my kakyoin impression)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-11 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
And you feel certain that there's a link between my presence on this app and the likelihood that I'll start having these...visions?
roseblooms: i mean yes heelies are great in concept but (DUBIOUS ❁ not sure if want)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-11 05:30 am (UTC)(link)
How utterly unsettling.

I suppose it doesn't help that I can't possibly imagine what sort of hallucinations I might have. I'm afraid I'm almost breathtakingly normal — honestly, to the point of being outright boring, perhaps.
roseblooms: but seriously does he know he's not wearing any pants (MENTION ❁ a shakespearean-grade aside)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-11 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
...As though one scenario jogs the memory of the other, you're saying? So — in your case, for example, seeing someone being arrested leading to the notion of your, ah, frog-man doing the same?
roseblooms: i'm pretty sure it'd involve tasing somebody at least (EXAMINE ❁ wwpd: what would parker do)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-05-11 05:41 am (UTC)(link)
Just now, you recalled something? That's...fascinating, to say the least.

For what it's worth, I didn't feel anything of the sort, so it's evidently not a shared experience — just a unilateral one.

(no subject)

[personal profile] roseblooms - 2017-05-11 15:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] roseblooms - 2017-05-13 00:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] roseblooms - 2017-05-15 02:19 (UTC) - Expand